Growth and Yield Performance of the Different Varieties of Pechay (Brassica chinensis) as Affected by the Different Organic Fertilizers under MSU-Marawi Condition

Saanoding A. Balayo Saanoding A. Balayo

Abstract


Most farmers traditionally use chemical or inorganic fertilizers in their farms because of its availability in the market. However, these types of fertilizers are expensive and develop soil acidity if continuously used. Organic fertilizers are now a promising method for sustainable farming in which most affordable compared to synthetic fertilizers. Organic fertilizers are produced from animal manures, crop residues, organic wastes through earthworm and other farm by-products. These improve the physical, chemical and microbial status of the soil. However, the use of organic fertilizers are not widely adopted by farmers due to low nutrient composition, bulky and require more time and labor for collection, storage, transport and application. Thus, this study aimed to determine the growth and yield performance of the varieties of pechay treated by the different organic fertilizers. Specifically it sought to determine and compare the effects of the different sources of organic fertilizers on the growth and yield of the different varieties of pechay; to determine which of the different sources of organic fertilizers gives the highest yield using the different varieties of pechay; and to determine which of the different treatment combinations (varieties of pechay and sources of fertilizers) gives the highest yield. The organic fertilizers used in the study were F1 (carabao manure), F2 (goat manure), and F3 (vermicast). Twenty five (25) grams per hill as recommended rate was applied basally in each source of organic fertilizer. The experimental design used was a 2x3 factorial experiment in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD).  The primary distinguishing feature of the RCBD is the presence of blocks of equal size, each of which contains all the treatments. It is composed of six (6) treatment combinations; two (2) varieties of pechay as factor A and three (3) different organic fertilizers as factor B and replicated three (3) times. The result of the study revealed that the highest yield was obtained in the treatment T3 (V1F3 -Black Behi x vermicast) that differed significantly from the treatment T4 (V2F1 -Haridigma x carabao manure).

 



Keywords


Keywords: growth, pechay, fertilizers, organic, farmers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bautista, O. K. and R. MABESA, 1990. Vegetable Production. Published by University of the Philippines, Los Baños, Laguna.

Cosico, W. 1976. “High Profits from Organic Fertilizers Crop of Soils†Countryside Banking, May 1976.

De la Cruz, A. M. and O. K. BAUTISTA. Pechay Production in the Philippines. Published by University of the Philippines, Los Baños, Laguna.

Golabi, M. H., T. E. Marler, E. Smith, F. CRUZ, J.H. Laurence and M.J. Denney, 2003. Use of Compost as an Alternative to Synthetic Fertilizers for Crop Production and Agricultural Sustainability for Island of Guam, Extension Bulletin 531, Food and Fertilizer Technology Center. Department of Agricultural Technology, Taiwan, ROC.

Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez,m1990.Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. An International Rice Research Book. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Singapore

Philippine Council for Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Resources Research and Development (2008). The Philippines Recommends for Organic Fertilizer Production and Utilization.

Philippine Council for Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Resources Research and Development (2008). Sustainable Development Through Organic Agriculture.

Sangatanan, P.D. and R.L. Sangatanan (2000). Practical Guide to Organic Gardening. 1st ed.

Web Sources

http://www.edis.efas.ufl.edu.com

http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_cabbage

http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs.com

http://www.gardeningknowhow.com/composting/manures/goatmanure-fertilzer.html

http://www.goatkingdom.tripod.com/goat-manure

http://www.googlearthworms.com/vermicompost.html

http://www.morarkango.com/biotechnology/app_benefits.php


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences

Print version: 1694-2620
Online version: 1694-2639