Enhancing the classroom participation: The Case of 2nd Year Students of Water Resources and Irrigation Management (BSc) at Dilla University

Adimasu Woldesenbet Worako

Abstract


Education is a pillar to socio-economic, political and sustainable development of a society and it’s also a basic source for the civilization. Ensuring the quality of education plays a great role in the process of producing a creative and innovative generation which solves the world’s pronounced problems on their own means. After 1994 the Ethiopian new education policy was launched the student-centered approaches became popular and applied in many education centers in order to ensure the quality of education. However, in the higher education centers the implementation was very poor due to several reasons. In Dilla University also the implementation is so weak and student’s participation in the classroom is too passive. Hence, this action research was designed to enhance the participation of students in the class for the course soil and water conservation engineering. All of students registered for the course were selected and primary and secondary data collection methods were used to accomplish the work. The collected and observed data were organized and analyzed qualitatively and explained briefly. Intervention measures were designed by considering and out-looking the student’s condition in the classroom for the long time. Based on the study the factors affecting the participation of students in the classroom identified were shying and fearing for their friends, language problem, teaching methodology, and lack of material accessibility, sitting arrangement and others. Designed actions taken to solve the stated troubles were describing the lesson objectives clearly and precisely before the main topic, allowing students to talk freely in the classroom by oral motivation and appreciation system, orienting the sitting arrangements in the room, forming cooperative-learning teams, assigning duties and responsibilities for each student in their group and observing all students without any discrimination or bias. Actions which are taken to solve the problem have shown viable out-puts like self-esteem and confidence, self-respect among students and cooperativeness, participation in every issue raised by anyone, positive attitude for the cooperative-learning and speaking freely in and out of class. Hence, the devised or designed action plans have a great role in enhancing the participation of students in the classroom and shaped the learning environment in advanced way. Every instructor should implement the cooperative-learning system to increase the participation of students and to elevate the level of education quality in the universities.


Keywords


Education; cooperative-learning; intervention actions; student-participation; student-centered

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abel, G. (2008). Assessing tutorial participation and participation in assessing tutorials: A teaching intern's experience. In Preparing for the graduate of 2015. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 30–31 January 2008. Perth: Curtin University of Technology.

Barbara, C.H. (1996). Thirty years of stories: The professor’s place in student memories. Change, 28(6), 10- 17.

Bean, J. C.& Peterson, D.(2016). Grading Classroom Participation—Summary: Grading class participation signals students the kind of learning and thinking an instructor values. This chapter describes three models of class participation, several models for assessment including a sample rubric, problems with assessing classroom participation, and strategies for overcoming these problems. https://teaching.unsw.edu.au/assessing-classroom- participation

Binulal, K.R. (2013).Effects of Instructional Practices on Improving the Achievement of Low Achievers. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 4, April 2013 1 ISSN 2250-3153

Boniecki, K. A. & Moore, S. (2003). Breaking the silence: Using a token economy to reinforce classroom participation. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 224-227. (ES)

Brophy, J. E. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Boston: McGraw Hill.

Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2004). Classroom participation and discussion effectiveness: Student-generated strategies. Communication Education, 53, 103-115. (ES)

Dancer, D. & Kamvounias, P. (2005). Student involvement in assessment: A project designed to assess class participation fairly and reliably. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 445-454. (ES)

EEP (Ethiopian Education Policy). (1994). Federal Democratic Republic Government of Ethiopia. Education and Training Policy, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Fassinger, P. A. (2000). How classes influence students’ participation in college classrooms. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 35, 38-47. (ES)

Feldman, K.A. (1988). Effective college teaching from the students’ and the faculty’s view: Matched or mismatched priorities? Research in Higher Education, 28(4), 291-344.

Felder, M. & Brent, R. (1996) ‘Navigating the Bumpy Road to Student-Centered Instruction’, College Teaching 44(2): 43–7.

Fewings, D.R and Wonder, N.X. (2009). Classroom Participation Strategy: In Principles of Finance Courses. American Journal of Business Education – March/April 2009, Vo2, No.2: 39-46.

Fritschner, L. M. (2000). Inside the undergraduate college classroom: Faculty and students differ on the meaning of student participation. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 342-362. (LR)

Good, T. L., &Brophy, J. E. (2006). Looking in classrooms (8th ed.). New York: Longman.

Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40-53.

Graham, C. R., Tripp, T. R., Seawright, L. & Joeckel, G. L. (2007) Empowering or Compelling Reluctant Participators Using Audience Response Systems, Active Learning in Higher Education,Vol8(3): 233–258, DOI: 10.1177/1469787407081885

Hargis, C. H. (1997). Teaching low achieving and disadvantaged students (2nd ed.).Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas.

Haruna, P. F. (2007) Dimensions of Ethical Dilemmas in Classroom Participation, PA Times, Jun2007, Vol. 30 Issue 6, p6-6, 2/3p;

Kumar D.R. (2007). Students’ Classroom Participation for Improved Learning in an English Language Skills Course: An Action Research Report. University of South Pacific, Working paper No.21.

Myers, S. A., Horan, S. M., Kennedy-Lightsey, C. D., Madlock, P. E., Sidelinger, R. J., Byrnes, K., Frisby, B., & Mansson, D. H. (2009). The relationship between college students’ self- reports of class participation and perceived instructor impressions. Communication Research Reports,26, 123-133.

Myers, S. A., Martin, M. M., & Mottet, T. P. (2002). Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors: Considering instructor socio- communicative style, student socio- communicative orientation, and student gender. Communication Education, 51, 121-133. (ES)

Norton, L.S. & Crowley, C.M. (1995). Can students be helped to learn how to learn? A evaluation of an Approaches to Learning programme for first-year degree students. Higher Education, 29, 307-328.

Raisa,B.G.,Shehla,K.,Azra,A.,Shanaz,C.,Tanveer,S.,Yasmin,P.,Joanne,P.,& Donald, S.(2014). Enhancing Educators’ Skills for Promoting Critical Thinking in Their Classroom Discourses: A Randomized Control Trial. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Vol.26, No. 1, 37- 54.

Rich, S. P. (2004), Student Performance: Does Effort Matter? Hankamer School of Business, Baylor University, pp. 1-26.

Rita, R.C. (1996). Institutional commitment to fairness in college teaching. In L. Fisch (Ed.), Ethical dimensions of college and university teaching: Understanding and honoring the special relationship between teachers and students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 66, 37-46. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Rocca, K. A. (2009). Participation in the college classroom: The impact of instructor immediacy and verbal aggression. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 43, 22-33. (ES)

Snyder, K. D. (2003) Ropes, Poles, and Space: Active Learning in Business Education, Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 4(2): 159–167 [1469-7874 (200307) 4:2; 159– 167; 033891]

Tatar, S. (2005). Why keep silent? The classroom participation experiences of non- native- English speaking students. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5, 284-293. (ES)

Wade, R. (1994). Teacher education students’ views on class discussion: Implications for fostering critical reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 231-243. (ES)

Winters, E.(2002). Seven styles of learning: The part they play when developing interactivity. Retrieved June 3, 2002, from http://www.bena.com/ewinters/styles.html

Zepke, N. & Leach, L. (2010). Improving Student Engagement: Ten Proposals for Action, Active Learning in Higher Education, 2010 11: 167, DOI: 10.1177/1469787410379680.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences

Print version: 1694-2620
Online version: 1694-2639