Development and Validation of a Community-Based Learning Resource Package in Inorganic Chemistry

Epiphania B. Magwilang

Abstract


The chief aim of this research work was to develop and validate a learning resource package in inorganic chemistry that is community-based. The study underwent four stages of material validation, namely: preparation, development, validation and try-out. The study employed the descriptive method of research to describe and evaluate the developed learning resource package through a questionnaire checklist. Twelve chemistry experts determined the validity of the said package as to content. One hundred two chemistry students of Mountain Province State Polytechnic College determined the learning resource package’s reliability as to parts specifically on objectives, content, assessment and its instructional characteristics. The resource package was further tried out on two inorganic chemistry classes employing the quasi-experimental method. Preliminary tests and post-tests were administered to the two classes to determine their performance in inorganic chemistry in terms of knowledge acquisition. Responses were tallied, tabulated and treated with appropriate statistical treatment. The study found out that the developed learning resource package was very much valid as to content and very much reliable as to parts and instructional characteristics. Further, students exposed to the developed learning resource package performed better than the students taught without the use of it. Inorganic chemistry lessons can thus be made more culturally-relevant and meaningful to the students through the integration of community-based resources in the form of local products, everyday activities, agricultural practices, natural resources and local industries. This study therefore suggests that the developed learning resource package be adopted for use in the teaching and learning of inorganic chemistry.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijhss.11.2.3


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, J., Hassan, A., & Abiddin, N. (2008). Developing Validity & Reliability of a Drug Addiction Module Among Drug Addicts Who are Undergoing Treatment at Rehabilitation Centers. The Journal of International Social Research, 1(1).

Ballesteros, J. O. (2019). Localization & Contextualization of Science Activities in Enhancing Learners’ Performance. Retrieved on January 2019 from https://www.academia.edu/26424467/Localization_&_Contextualization_of_Science_Activities_in_Enhancing_Learners_Performance.

Belt, S. T., Leisvik, M. T. Hyde, A. J., & Overton, T. L. (2005).Using a Context-based Approach to Undergraduate Chemistry Teaching – A Case Study for Introductory Physical Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research & Practice, The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Braund, M. R. (1999). Using Drama to Improve Student Teachers’ Underst&ing in the Physical Sciences (Report). Brentton Hall College of the University of the Leeds. Retrieved July 6, 2011 from www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-157586961.html.

Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E., & Bursten, B. E. (1999). Chemistry: The Central Science (8th Ed.). KY: Prentice Hall.

Caridaoan, M. P. (2007). A Teaching Resource Package for Developing Science Process Skills in the Intermediate Grades. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis), Mariano Marcos State University, Laoag City.

Centre for Teaching Excellence, University of Waterloo (CTE-UW). (2019). Community-Based Learning. Retrieved January 2019 from https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence.

Chemical Educational Foundation (CEF). (2014). You Be The Chemist Challenge: Passport to Science Exploration. Retrieved November 2014 from www.chemed.org.

De, C., & Mary, J. T. (2006). Development & Evaluation of Modules on Selected Topics in General Chemistry for Tertiary Students. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis), Central Luzon State University.

De, S., & Gregorio, M. (1999). A H&book of Instructional Modules in General Inorganic Chemistry. University of Baguio, Baguio City.

De, S., & Gregorio, M. (2000). Common Statistical Tools & Application Problems for Behavioral Sciences. MPSPC, Bontoc, Mountain Province.

Department of Education (Third Elementary Education Project, TEEP) & UP College of Education. (2002). Culture Responsive Curriculum for Indigenous Peoples (CCIP).

Gabel, D. (1999). Enhancing the Conceptual Underst&ing of Science. Educational Horizons. H.W. Wilson Company.

Gabel, D. (1999). Improving Teaching & Learning Through Chemistry Education Research: A look to the Future. Journal of Chemical Education. 4(1).

Hidden curriculum. (2014). In S. Abbott (Ed.), The glossary of education reform. Retrieved from http://edglossary.org/hidden-curriculum.

Jary, D., & Jary, J. (1995). Sociology. Glasgow: Harper Collins.

Key, J. P. (1997). Research Design in Occupational Education. Excerpt from the Thesis H&book. Oklahoma State University.

Magwilang, E. B. (2016). Teaching Chemistry in Context: Its Effects on Students’ Motivation, Attitudes & Achievement in Chemistry. International Journal of Teaching, Learning & Educational Research, 15(4).

Ocampo, D. (2014). The K to 12 Curriculum. Retrieved from www.gov.ph/k-12.

Ornstein, A. (1990). The Development & Evaluation of Curriculum Materials. National Association of Secondary School Principals.

Rajeswari, C., & Mohan, S. (1995). Developing Multimedia Instructional Strategy Selection, Consolidation, Validation. Journal of Research in Educational Media, 3(1).

Soberano, A. (2009). Strategic Intervention Materials in Chemistry: Development & Effectiveness. A Paper Presented in the 3rdCosMED International Conference 2009, SEAMEO RECSAM.

University of the Philippines - National Institute for Science & Mathematics Education Development (UP-NISMED). (2003). Supervision of Science & Mathematics Teaching, University of the Philippines.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences

Print version: 1694-2620
Online version: 1694-2639